I saw Christopher Nolan’s Oppenheimer in the theater three times, and the same for his Interstellar (still his best movie); I could have seen them both many more times. Others, like The Dark Knight Rises and Inception, were incredible experiences to have at the movie theater.

After watching The Odyssey on opening night, though, I had to remember that sometimes his movies fall flat. And when The Odyssey falls flat, it hurts that much more: it is a foundational story which, in the hands of somebody like Nolan, could have been a generational event. As it is, the most spectacular moments in the movie are far outweighed by what doesn’t work.

To get the good parts out of the way, there many memorable set pieces: the Trojan Horse being pulled inside of Troy and set upright; the two times the destruction of Troy becomes the movie’s focus; Samantha Morton’s section as Circe, which should be made available as a standalone short film. Best of all for me, there is Odysseus and his men going to the Underworld and then being chased back to their ships by their dead comrades. And then there’s the prelude to the final slaughter of the suitors: here, during the montage of men trying unsuccessfully to string Odysseus’ bow, the suitors finally feel like they’ve stepped out of Homer in their mix of mockery, shame, and unrelieved testosterone.

But these moments are few and far between. I could tell in the first five minutes that something was wrong. Tom Holland as Odysseus’s son, Telemachus, is almost always awful, and seems to be reading his lines mechanically from cue cards just offscreen. There is an unearned villainy to Robert Pattinson’s portrayal as one of the evil suitors: he wants us to dislike him and believe that he’s been hanging around the palace for years, but I don’t buy it. He just looks like the young vampire from Twilight, all grown up and pretending to sneer.

And really, nearly every problem I have with the movie comes down to casting. Not the click-bait nonsense over Lupita Nyong’o as Helen of Troy and Clytemnestra, or Elliot Page as the Greek warrior, Sinon (whoever started and went along with that made up controversy deserves to be swallowed by one or more Homeric monsters). Page actually does a good job of disappearing into his role, but few of the other actors ever do. Damon still looks and sounds like Will Hunting saying “How do you like them apples?”; Anne Hathaway as Penelope is just off Devil Wears Prada 2; there is no reason for Charlize Theron to be playing Calypso; and Jon Bernthal as Menelaus just made me think, “Oh, that’s the Punisher, and that’s Wayne from The Walking Dead.” Only John Leguizamo as the blind swineherd Eumeaus comes off convincingly, and with great pathos.

I’ve rarely had this problem before. I think of Damon’s performance as an early CIA spy in the 2006 movie The Good Shephard. Spending most of the movie in a suit and tie, and always clean-shaven, in that movie he still somehow doesn’t look or sound like himself. And yet with Nolan’s Odyssey,the costumes and makeup, and even the astounding sets, rarely left me convinced that I was taking a peek back into the Bronze Age.

Maybe it’s a problem with the script? If so, it’s possible that nobody, even unknown actors from Greece, could have pulled this off. Maybe Nolan, who previously adapted the Batman comics and a huge biography of Robert Oppenheimer, finally met his match with Homer. Maybe I’m too attached to Homer, or mythology, and see how impossible it is to turn great poems into acted-out dramas. It’s like wondering how a film version of the Book of Job, or Dante, would work out: there just aren’t actors, or directors, who could do it.

Maybe—and this feels most right to me—Homer’s poem and Nolan’s movie are both episodic, and just as few people need to read all of Homer more than once, and only go back to their favorite parts, maybe this is how I should view Nolan’s movie. Maybe this is where I see Homer done right most of all, even if it makes for a disappointing movie overall.

I also know that I’m clearly in the minority about the movie. It may well be setting off the imaginations, especially, of young people all over the world, who may not have been familiar with Homer before. It may get people to actually read Homer, too, which would be spectacular. For all of these reasons, I can’t bring myself to not recommend the movie—after all, a so-so Nolan film is still better than nearly anybody else. And if anything, The Odyssey’s overwhelming success will pave the way for another—hopefully better—movie from Nolan in three years or so.

Let me know what you thought in the comments.


Discover more from Tim Miller

Subscribe to get the latest posts to your email.

One response

  1. Yeah. I agree with you. I struggled right from the beginning with the weakening of the language. To call Odysseus dad instead of father… I’m not sure why it bothered me. It just felt like a desecration.

Leave a Reply

#235 - London in 2011, London in the 1660s - Human Voices Wake Us

An episode from 7/27/26: Tonight, we visit London at two different times in history. First, I read passages from Craig Taylor’s 2011 book Londoners: The days and nights of London now—as told by those who love it, hate it, live it, left it, and long for it. Then we go back a few centuries in Liza Picard’s Restoration London: Everyday Life in London 1660-1670, and focus especially on the lives of women, children, and the poor.I also talk about the value of accounts like these, which don’t pretend to be definitive or objective. But what else do we really hold onto, in the end, other than vivid and subjective stories told by the people we’re closest to, or gleaned from books that we love? Taylor and Picard’s books have both become those for me.The best way to support the podcast is by leaving a review on Apple or Spotify, sharing it with others, or sending me a note on what you think. You can also order any of my books: Time and the River: From Columbine to the Invention of Fire, Notes from the Grid, To the House of the Sun, The Lonely Young & the Lonely Old, and Bone Antler Stone. I've also edited a handful of books in the S4N Pocket Poems series. I also have a YouTube channel where I share poems and excerpts from these books, mostly as YouTube shorts.Email me at humanvoiceswakeus1@gmail.com.
  1. #235 - London in 2011, London in the 1660s
  2. #234: The Intensity of Private Moments
  3. #233: Talking Baseball with Tom Hart
  4. #232: Ted Hughes in Alaska
  5. #231: The mythology of the moon
  6. #230 - The mythology of the bear, and Byron gets apocalyptic
  7. #229 : Mother Earth and myths of mining and agriculture
  8. #228 - What Ted Bundy did on July 14, 1974
  9. #227 - The Great Fire of London and the destruction of Jerusalem
  10. #226: The Vitality and terror of cities

Discover more from Tim Miller

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from Tim Miller

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading