A great essay on why the so-called Northern Renaissance is sometimes put below that of the Italian, even called primitive by comparison. The opposite has always been true for me, Italian Ren mostly boring me, & everybody north of the Alps, with their atmospherics & intimate portraits & use of oils, being immensely more in all respects.
The 15th century Flemish artists have long been referred to as ‘primitive’. You might ask why this idea that artists who hail from north of the Alps comes from and just who they are. My concept of primitive is not quite the level of sophisticted observation depicted on a flat surface as seen in the works of Jan van Eyck (before 1390 – 1441), Robert Campin (1372–1444) and Rogier van der Weyden (1399/1400-1464). Nor for that matter, Hugo van der Goes (1435/40 – 1482). In my article on the da Vinci painting of Christ as the Salvator Mundi, I described how this concept was not new having first been used by the Bruges illuminator, William Vrelant (d1481/2), in a Book of Hours dated 1465.
I suppose it all depends on your personal definition of ‘primitive’, which begs the question of how this description of these northern european artists came…
View original post 2,019 more words